Microneedling for melasma is one of the most searched cosmetic dermatology topics right now, and for good reason. If you have ever dealt with those stubborn, symmetrical patches of darker skin on your cheeks, forehead, or upper lip, you already know how frustrating this condition can be. It resists treatment, it comes back, and it seems to have a mind of its own. The procedure is often promoted as a "texture-meets-pigment" solution, but melasma is biologically complex and notoriously relapse-prone. That means results depend on smart technique, careful post-treatment care, and disciplined microneedling aftercare as much as the procedure itself.
If you are still researching whether microneedling is the right move for your melasma we'll walk you through the biology, the evidence, and the realistic expectations you should carry into a consultation. If you have already had a session and want to know what comes next, the aftercare and recovery sections later in this article are your action plan. Either way, every claim made here is grounded in recent peer-reviewed research, not social media hype or marketing copy.
Throughout this article, we draw from a focused set of 2025-2026 clinical studies and reviews. These include a comprehensive review of melasma mechanisms and treatment innovations (Liao et al., 2026), a comparative study of microneedling versus chemical peels for moderate-to-severe melasma (Batool et al., 2025), a split-face randomized trial evaluating microneedle fractional radiofrequency combined with platelet-rich plasma (Chen et al., 2026), a review on the adjunctive use of microneedling with tranexamic acid (Dhaliwal et al., 2026), and a published commentary offering important nuance on PRP technique interpretation (Wang et al., 2026). Let us walk through what the science actually says.
Don't guess your recovery. Download FREE Clinical Microneedling Protocol Here
Melasma 101: Causes, Triggers, and Why It Is Hard to Treat
Melasma involves far more than "too much pigment in one area." Modern research frames it as a condition tied to complex pigment deposition pathways that overlap with features of photoaging. In their 2026 review, Liao et al. describe melasma as a condition where multiple biological mechanisms converge - it is not just a melanocyte problem, but a broader skin environment issue influenced by UV damage, vascular changes, basement membrane disruption, and inflammatory signaling. This is precisely why single-modality treatments so often disappoint. The condition has multiple drivers, and addressing only one tends to produce incomplete or temporary results (Liao et al., 2026).
Let us make this personal for a moment. The triggers most melasma sufferers recognize in their daily lives - UV exposure (even through car windows), hormonal shifts from pregnancy or oral contraceptives, heat from cooking or exercise, and even friction from overly aggressive skincare - all feed into these overlapping pathways. That is why your melasma might flare in summer, calm down in winter, and roar back to life during a stressful month. It is reactive. It is chronic. And it is the reason that aftercare and ongoing maintenance matter just as much as whatever procedure you choose.
🔑 Key takeaway: Melasma is chronic and reactive - the goal is control, not perfection. Treatment innovation discussions in the dermatology literature consistently emphasize multi-target approaches rather than single-modality fixes.
What Is Microneedling and How Does It Work in Skin?
At its core, microneedling creates controlled micro-injuries in the skin using fine needles. These tiny punctures are intended to trigger the body's natural wound-healing and repair pathways, which can lead to dermal remodeling and improved skin quality over time. Think of it as a signal to your skin that says, "Time to rebuild."
The simplified pathway looks like this:
🔄 Needles → Microchannels in the skin → Wound-healing response activated → Potential improvement in uneven tone + overall skin quality
But here is something most blog posts skip over entirely: "microneedling" in clinical studies is not one uniform procedure. There is a meaningful difference between a standard microneedling pen (which creates mechanical micro-injuries only) and a device-based variant like microneedle fractional radiofrequency, or MFRF, which combines mechanical needling with radiofrequency energy delivered through the needle tips. The studies referenced in this article evaluate both types, and conflating them would be misleading.
| Feature | Standard Microneedling Pen | Microneedle Fractional RF (MFRF) |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Mechanical micro-injury only | Mechanical micro-injury + radiofrequency energy |
| Setting | Clinical office; some consumer devices exist | Clinical office only |
| Studied in this article's sources | Batool et al., 2025; Dhaliwal et al., 2026 | Chen et al., 2026 |
Microneedling is also increasingly positioned not just as a standalone treatment, but as a platform - a way to enhance delivery of topical agents like tranexamic acid or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) through the microchannels it creates. This "enhanced delivery" function is a major reason it appears in combination protocols for melasma (Dhaliwal et al., 2026; Chen et al., 2026). The Liao et al. (2026) review also situates microneedling within a broader landscape of cosmetic dermatology innovations, including procedural and combination approaches for pigmentary conditions.
Understanding these distinctions matters because when you see "microneedling" results online, you need to ask: which device? What depth? What was applied during or after? Was it a clinical setting or a home roller? These details change everything.
Can I Do Microneedling On Melasma?
Evidence does exist for microneedling-based interventions in melasma. Batool et al. (2025) directly studied microneedling in patients with moderate-to-severe melasma, comparing it to chemical peels. The Liao et al. (2026) review positions microneedling within a broader toolkit of innovative approaches for melasma management. So the procedure is being actively investigated and discussed in the dermatology literature for this specific indication.
However - and this is the part many promotional articles gloss over - melasma management is deeply nuanced. Not every person with melasma is the same candidate. The studies referenced here do not necessarily address every subgroup, skin type, or clinical scenario. Your candidacy depends on factors including your Fitzpatrick skin type, whether you have active inflammation or breakouts, your current use of retinoids or strong exfoliants (which can thin the skin barrier), and whether you are pregnant or breastfeeding. A dermatologist assessment is not a nice-to-have. It is the entire point.
📋 Before You Book: Questions to Ask Your Dermatologist
→ What is my melasma subtype (epidermal, dermal, mixed)?
→ Am I a candidate given my skin type and current medications?
→ What combination approach, if any, do you recommend?
→ What does realistic improvement look like for my specific case?
→ What post-treatment care protocol will I need to follow?
The takeaway here is conditional, not absolute: microneedling can be considered for melasma in appropriate candidates, under professional guidance, as part of a broader management strategy. It is not something to DIY based on an Instagram reel (Batool et al., 2025; Liao et al., 2026).
Benefits Of Microneedling For Melasma
When we talk about benefits, the framing matters. This is not a "top 10 amazing results" list. It is a look at what the clinical literature actually discusses as potential upsides - each with an honest qualifier attached.
✅ Improved evenness of skin tone → Depends on: severity of melasma, skin type, treatment protocol, and number of sessions. Batool et al. (2025) investigated microneedling for moderate-to-severe melasma and compared outcomes with chemical peels, supporting the discussion that microneedling is a clinically investigated option for pigment improvement.
✅ Enhanced delivery of topical adjuncts → Depends on: which agent is used, needle depth, and the clinician's protocol. One of microneedling's most discussed benefits is its ability to create temporary microchannels that allow topical agents to penetrate more effectively. This is the mechanistic rationale behind pairing microneedling with tranexamic acid (Dhaliwal et al., 2026) and PRP (Chen et al., 2026). It is not just about the needling - it is about what the needling allows through.
✅ Studied as comparable or complementary to chemical peels → Depends on: individual response and melasma subtype. The Batool et al. (2025) comparative study design gives clinicians and patients a direct reference point for weighing microneedling against another common treatment modality.
✅ Minimal structural damage compared to some ablative options → Depends on: device used, settings, and operator skill. Microneedling is generally positioned as less aggressive than ablative laser resurfacing, which can be particularly relevant for darker skin types where aggressive energy-based treatments carry higher pigmentation risks.
These benefits are real and supported by the literature, but none of them are guarantees. Each one comes with a "depends on" because melasma is that kind of condition - individual variability is the rule, not the exception (Batool et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2026; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).

Can Microneedling Help Melasma?
Yes, but the strength of that "yes" varies depending on which evidence you are looking at and what exactly was studied. Let us be specific.
Comparative evidence exists. Batool et al. (2025) directly compared microneedling with chemical peels in patients who had moderate-to-severe melasma. This gives us a head-to-head look at how microneedling stacks up against a well-established treatment option.
Device-combination evidence exists. Chen et al. (2026) conducted a split-face randomized trial evaluating microneedle fractional radiofrequency combined with PRP for melasma. A split-face design means each participant served as their own control - one side of the face received one treatment, the other side received the comparator - which is a strong way to reduce individual variability when measuring outcomes.
Adjunct combination evidence is actively explored. Dhaliwal et al. (2026) reviewed the use of microneedling with tranexamic acid for melasma, examining effectiveness, tolerability, and safety across available evidence.
Here is something worth understanding about the evidence hierarchy: a split-face randomized controlled trial like the Chen et al. study provides stronger within-person evidence than a standard two-group comparison like the Batool et al. study, which in turn provides stronger evidence than a narrative review alone. This does not mean one study is "bad" and another is "good" - they answer different questions at different levels of rigor. But you deserve to know which claims rest on which quality of evidence.
📊 The Realistic Promise
Realistic: Gradual improvement in melasma appearance, often requiring multiple sessions, with maintenance likely necessary over time.
Not realistic: Complete clearing after one session, permanent resolution, or replacing rigorous sun protection.
What the studies actually tested: Structured clinical protocols with professional oversight - not at-home devices or single isolated treatments.
Can Microneedling Cure Melasma?
Let us be direct: no study in this article's evidence set supports phrasing microneedling as a cure for melasma.
This is not a failure of microneedling specifically. It is a reflection of what melasma is. The Liao et al. (2026) review presents melasma as a complex condition tied to multiple overlapping mechanisms - pigment deposition pathways and photoaging features - that imply chronicity and the ongoing need for management rather than a one-time fix. When researchers discuss "innovations" and "adjunctive approaches," they are speaking the language of long-term management, not eradication.
Dhaliwal et al. (2026), in reviewing microneedling with tranexamic acid, frame the discussion around effectiveness and tolerability within treatment protocols - again, management-oriented language rather than cure-oriented claims.
Here is a reframe that might actually be more helpful than the cure question: the better question is not "Can I cure it?" but "Can I manage it well enough that it no longer runs my decisions?" Can you go out without feeling self-conscious? Can you simplify your makeup routine? Can you feel like your skin is improving rather than worsening? The evidence supports management as a realistic, worthy, and achievable goal (Liao et al., 2026; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
Microneedling For Melasma Before And After
"Before and after" is probably the most searched phrase alongside any cosmetic procedure, and it is completely understandable. You want to see what is possible. But we need to talk about why most before-and-after images you find online are unreliable for setting your expectations.
The vast majority of before-and-after photos on social media and marketing websites are uncontrolled. They are taken under different lighting conditions, at different times of day, sometimes with different cameras or filters, and they almost never disclose what other products or treatments the person was using simultaneously. This is not evidence. It is marketing.
Clinical study designs are far more reliable for understanding what outcomes actually look like. The Chen et al. (2026) split-face randomized trial is a particularly strong example because each patient's own face serves as the comparison - one side receives the active treatment combination, the other serves as the control. This eliminates countless variables that make social media before-and-afters misleading. Similarly, the Batool et al. (2025) comparative study evaluated outcomes using clinical assessment frameworks in a real patient cohort (Batool et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2026).
What to Generally Expect by Phase:
| Phase | What to Generally Expect | What Is Not Expected |
|---|---|---|
| Immediately post-procedure | Redness, mild swelling, skin feels warm | Severe pain, blistering, open wounds |
| Short-term recovery | Gradual calming, possible flaking, sensitivity | Immediate dramatic lightening |
| After a series of sessions | Potential gradual improvement in evenness of tone | Complete and permanent clearing |
| Long-term | Maintenance sessions and rigorous sun protection likely needed | "Set it and forget it" results |
If you are currently in the recovery window after a session, the aftercare guidance at the end of this article is your action plan.
Best Microneedling Serum For Melasma
The studies reviewed here evaluate two specific adjuncts used in clinical microneedling protocols for melasma. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is discussed in the Dhaliwal et al. (2026) review as an adjunct used with microneedling, examining its effectiveness, tolerability, and safety in the context of melasma treatment. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is studied in combination with microneedle fractional radiofrequency in the Chen et al. (2026) split-face randomized trial. Wang et al. (2026), in their published commentary, add important nuance about how PRP technique and preparation claims should be interpreted carefully.
| Agent | Context in Which It Was Studied | How It Was Applied |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acid (TXA) | Adjunct with microneedling for melasma | Clinician-applied within a treatment protocol |
| Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) | Combined with microneedle fractional RF | Clinician-prepared and applied in-office |
Here is the critical distinction most articles miss: these are clinician-applied agents used within controlled clinical protocols. They are not retail serums you purchase online and apply at home after rolling a derma-roller over your face. The studies do not validate the practice of applying active serums to freshly microneedled skin outside of a professional clinical setting. Doing so introduces risks including irritation, allergic reaction, infection, and paradoxical worsening of pigmentation - none of which are outcomes you want.
⚠️ If you see a product marketed as the "best microneedling serum for melasma," ask yourself: was this specific product studied in a clinical trial for this specific use? If the answer is no, the marketing claim is not supported by the evidence discussed here (Dhaliwal et al., 2026; Chen et al., 2026; Wang et al., 2026).
Can Microneedling Cause Melasma?
The concern is biologically plausible: microneedling creates a controlled inflammatory response in the skin, and inflammation is a known trigger for pigmentation changes, particularly in individuals with darker skin types or pre-existing pigmentary conditions.
None of the studies in this article's evidence set specifically investigated whether microneedling causes melasma in individuals who did not previously have it. However, the broader principle from the Liao et al. (2026) review - that melasma involves complex interactions between inflammation, pigment pathways, and photoaging - implies that any procedure causing skin inflammation carries theoretical risk in susceptible individuals. This is not unique to microneedling; it applies to chemical peels, lasers, and other modalities as well.
The practical takeaway: if you are prone to pigmentation issues or have a personal or family history of melasma, this is a conversation to have with your dermatologist before any procedure that involves skin inflammation, microneedling included (Liao et al., 2026).
Can Microneedling Worsen Melasma?
The same biological logic applies. If microneedling is performed too aggressively - too deep, too frequently, without adequate post-treatment care, or in the context of uncontrolled sun exposure - the resulting inflammation could theoretically stimulate further pigment production in already-sensitized skin. The Dhaliwal et al. (2026) review addresses tolerability and safety alongside effectiveness, suggesting that the potential for adverse outcomes is part of the clinical conversation, not something dismissed by the literature.
Key risk factors for worsening include inappropriate needle depth, lack of sun protection after the procedure, performing microneedling on actively inflamed skin, using irritating topical products during the healing window, and relying on at-home devices without professional guidance. The emphasis on "adjunctive" and "combination" protocols in the literature is partly about maximizing benefit, but it is equally about minimizing risk through professional oversight (Dhaliwal et al., 2026; Liao et al., 2026).
Microneedling Depth Is Important For Melasma
The logic is straightforward: shallower depths primarily affect the epidermis, where much melasma pigment resides, while deeper penetration reaches the dermis, where it can trigger more significant inflammation and wound-healing responses. For melasma - a condition that is exquisitely sensitive to inflammation - deeper is not automatically better. The Batool et al. (2025) study investigated microneedling in moderate-to-severe melasma within a structured clinical protocol, and the Chen et al. (2026) trial used a specific device (microneedle fractional radiofrequency) with controlled parameters. In both cases, the treatment settings were determined by trained clinicians, not by patients adjusting dials at home.
This is another reason at-home microneedling devices are not interchangeable with clinical procedures for melasma. Consumer devices typically operate at shallower depths, but even shallow needling on melasma-prone skin without proper protocol and aftercare introduces risk. Depth should be determined by a clinician based on your melasma subtype, skin thickness, and treatment goals (Batool et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2026).

Exosome Microneedling For Melasma
Exosome therapy combined with microneedling is generating significant buzz in aesthetic medicine, and you have likely seen it marketed as the "next generation" of regenerative skincare.
The principle of using microneedling as a delivery platform for bioactive agents - as seen with TXA (Dhaliwal et al., 2026) and PRP (Chen et al., 2026) - is the same concept that underlies exosome microneedling. The mechanism (channel creation for enhanced delivery) is established; what changes is the specific agent being delivered. As with any emerging therapy, look for published clinical trial data specific to melasma before committing to the cost and claims.
Laser Or Microneedling For Melasma?
The honest answer is that it depends on multiple factors including your skin type, melasma severity, prior treatment history, and your clinician's experience with each modality.
The Liao et al. (2026) review provides a broader landscape view of cosmetic dermatology innovations for melasma, which includes both energy-based devices and procedural approaches. The key insight from this review is that multi-target strategies are increasingly emphasized over single-modality treatments - meaning the real-world answer for many patients may not be "laser or microneedling" but rather a thoughtfully sequenced combination determined by a dermatologist.
One practical consideration worth noting: microneedling is often discussed as having a more favorable risk profile for darker skin types compared to certain laser modalities, which can carry higher risks of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. But this is a general principle, not a universal rule - individual assessment remains essential (Liao et al., 2026).
Microneedling Or IPL For Melasma
Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) is another technology commonly discussed for pigmentation concerns, and patients frequently ask whether it is a better choice than microneedling for melasma.
What the literature does consistently emphasize, particularly in the Liao et al. (2026) review, is that melasma involves complex mechanisms beyond simple pigment targeting. IPL targets pigment chromophores with light energy, but because melasma is not purely a pigment-excess problem - it involves vascular components, basement membrane changes, and photoaging pathways - approaches that address only one mechanism may produce incomplete or temporary results.
The same principle applies to microneedling as a standalone: it is when microneedling is used within combination protocols that the literature shows the most interest. The decision between IPL and microneedling should be made in consultation with a dermatologist who can evaluate your specific melasma characteristics (Liao et al., 2026).
Microneedling Or Microdermabrasion For Melasma
Microdermabrasion is a more superficial procedure that mechanically exfoliates the outermost layer of skin. It is less invasive than microneedling, has minimal downtime, and is widely available.
What the Batool et al. (2025) study does provide is a comparison between microneedling and chemical peels - both of which are more commonly positioned as intermediate-depth interventions compared to microdermabrasion. The key differentiator for microneedling in the melasma literature is its dual function: it provides collagen-remodeling stimulation and serves as a delivery platform for agents like TXA and PRP, which microdermabrasion does not offer in the same way.
For very mild melasma or as part of a maintenance routine, microdermabrasion may have a role - but the clinical investigation focus in current literature leans toward microneedling and combination protocols for moderate-to-severe cases (Batool et al., 2025; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
Microneedling With Tranexamic Acid
This combination deserves its own spotlight because it is one of the most specifically studied pairings in the melasma-microneedling literature.
Dhaliwal et al. (2026) published a review dedicated to exploring the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of microneedling used adjunctively with tranexamic acid for melasma treatment. Tranexamic acid works through mechanisms that are distinct from (and complementary to) microneedling's wound-healing pathway - it is thought to interfere with pigment-producing pathways that drive melasma persistence. When delivered through the microchannels created by microneedling, TXA has enhanced access to the target layers of skin.
The pairing is logical from a mechanistic standpoint: microneedling provides the delivery platform and remodeling stimulus, while TXA addresses the pigmentation biochemistry. The Dhaliwal et al. (2026) review examines this combination across available evidence and discusses it as a promising adjunctive approach. Importantly, they address tolerability and safety alongside effectiveness - acknowledging that combination protocols need to be evaluated holistically, not just for efficacy.
This is delivered in clinical settings as part of a structured protocol. It is not the same as purchasing a TXA serum online and applying it after using a home derma-roller - that extrapolation is not supported by the evidence discussed here (Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
Post-Treatment Care and Microneedling Aftercare for Melasma
Everything you do in the hours, days, and weeks after microneedling determines whether you get the benefit the procedure is designed to deliver - or whether you trigger a setback.
The emphasis on multi-target management and tolerability in the reviewed literature (Liao et al., 2026; Dhaliwal et al., 2026) underscores that the procedure is only half the equation. What you do after - your microneedling aftercare protocol - is what gives the biological repair process the environment it needs to work in your favor rather than against you.
Your Aftercare Framework:
☀️ Sun protection is non-negotiable. Melasma is photoresponsive. UV exposure after microneedling, when the skin barrier is temporarily compromised, is one of the fastest routes to worsening pigmentation. Broad-spectrum SPF 30 or higher, reapplied consistently, is the baseline - not a suggestion.
🧴 Simplify your skincare. In the days immediately following microneedling, your skin barrier is healing. This is not the time for retinoids, AHAs, BHAs, vitamin C serums, or any active ingredient your clinician has not specifically approved for post-treatment use.
🚿 Gentle cleansing only. Avoid scrubbing, exfoliating tools, hot water, and harsh cleansers. Lukewarm water and a mild, fragrance-free cleanser are your friends.
🔥 Avoid heat triggers. Saunas, hot yoga, intense exercise causing facial flushing, and prolonged heat exposure can exacerbate inflammation in freshly treated skin.
📅 Follow your clinician's timeline. Your dermatologist should provide a specific schedule for when to reintroduce active products, when to expect normal healing milestones, and when to return for follow-up. If they did not, call and ask.
The recurring theme across the studies in this guide is that melasma responds to sustained, disciplined management rather than dramatic one-time interventions. Your aftercare is where that management lives, day by day (Liao et al., 2026; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
Building Your Melasma Management Strategy: Putting It All Together
After walking through the biology, the evidence, the comparisons, and the aftercare, here is the synthesis. Microneedling for melasma is a legitimate, clinically investigated treatment approach - not a miracle, not a scam, but a tool with genuine potential when used correctly within a comprehensive plan.
The strongest approach, based on the literature reviewed here, involves professional assessment to determine your melasma subtype, skin type, and candidacy. It involves choosing the right microneedling modality (standard pen versus device-based variants like MFRF) based on clinical judgment, not marketing. It means considering evidence-supported adjuncts like tranexamic acid or PRP within a clinical protocol rather than self-prescribing retail products. And it absolutely requires disciplined aftercare - sun protection, gentle skincare, and patience - sustained over the long term.
Melasma may be chronic, but chronic does not mean unmanageable. The evidence supports a path toward meaningful improvement for many patients. The key is approaching that path with realistic expectations, professional guidance, and a commitment to the care that happens between sessions just as much as during them (Liao et al., 2026; Batool et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2026; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is microneedling effective for melasma?
Clinical evidence supports microneedling as an investigational treatment approach for melasma, particularly when used in combination with adjuncts like tranexamic acid or PRP under professional supervision. Results are typically gradual and require multiple sessions with ongoing maintenance (Batool et al., 2025; Dhaliwal et al., 2026).
How many microneedling sessions are needed for melasma?
The studies reviewed here evaluated structured multi-session clinical protocols rather than single treatments. Your dermatologist will determine the number of sessions based on your melasma severity, skin type, and response to initial treatments. Expect a series rather than a one-time procedure.
Can microneedling make melasma worse?
It is biologically possible if microneedling is performed too aggressively, without proper post-treatment care, or with uncontrolled sun exposure afterward. The inflammatory response from needling can trigger further pigmentation in susceptible skin, which is why professional oversight and disciplined aftercare are essential (Dhaliwal et al., 2026; Liao et al., 2026).
Is tranexamic acid good for melasma with microneedling?
Dhaliwal et al. (2026) reviewed the adjunctive use of microneedling with tranexamic acid for melasma and discussed it as a promising combination in terms of effectiveness, tolerability, and safety. It should be applied by a clinician within a controlled protocol, not self-administered at home on freshly needled skin.
What is the difference between microneedling and microneedle fractional radiofrequency?
Standard microneedling uses mechanical micro-injuries only, while microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) combines mechanical needling with radiofrequency energy delivered through the needle tips. MFRF was evaluated in a split-face randomized trial for melasma combined with PRP (Chen et al., 2026). They are not interchangeable procedures.
Can I use a home microneedling device for melasma?
The studies referenced in this article evaluated professional clinical-grade devices and protocols with trained clinicians controlling depth, technique, and adjunct application. At-home devices were not studied in this context, and extrapolating professional clinical results to consumer devices is not supported by this evidence.
References
Liao T, Luo R, Deng Y, Yang H, Du Y. Targeting Melasma: Innovations in Pigment Deposition and Photoaging in Cosmetic Dermatology. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(1):e70665. doi:10.1111/jocd.70665
Batool A, Seger AJ, Akhtar N, Mateen S, Amiruddin MU, Zain M. A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Chemical Peels and Microneedling in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Melasma. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e98962. doi:10.7759/cureus.98962
Chen Z, Li Y, Ou Y, Chen T, Chen Y, Chen J. Efficacy of Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split-Face, Randomized Trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(2):e70742. doi:10.1111/jocd.70742
Dhaliwal S, Dhanoa N, Rashid Z. Exploring the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of the Adjunctive Use of Microneedling With Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(3):e70763. doi:10.1111/jocd.70763
Wang D, Chen Y, Han Z. Comment on: Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(3):e70754. doi:10.1111/jocd.70754
